Business Description
ISIN : US0126531013
Share Class Description:
ALB: Ordinary SharesTotal Employee Number:
7,800Financial Strength
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash-To-Debt | 0.87 | |||||
Equity-to-Asset | 0.65 | |||||
Debt-to-Equity | 0.18 | |||||
Debt-to-EBITDA | 2.26 | |||||
Interest Coverage | 4.7 | |||||
Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | |||||
Altman Z-Score | 2.72 | |||||
Beneish M-Score | -3.15 | |||||
WACC vs ROIC | ||||||
Growth Rank
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate | -11.1 | |||||
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate | -52.1 | |||||
3-Year FCF Growth Rate | 2.4 | |||||
3-Year Book Growth Rate | -3.1 | |||||
Future 3-5Y Total Revenue Growth Rate Estimate | 8.39 |
Momentum Rank
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-Day RSI | 30.86 | |||||
9-Day RSI | 38.36 | |||||
14-Day RSI | 42.61 | |||||
3-1 Month Momentum % | -14.19 | |||||
6-1 Month Momentum % | -22.68 | |||||
12-1 Month Momentum % | 80.64 |
Liquidity Ratio
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Ratio | 2.09 | |||||
Quick Ratio | 1.35 | |||||
Cash Ratio | 0.86 | |||||
Days Inventory | 114.9 | |||||
Days Sales Outstanding | 39.79 | |||||
Days Payable | 76.63 |
Dividend & Buy Back
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dividend Yield % | 1.31 | |||||
Dividend Payout Ratio | 0.26 | |||||
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate | 0.8 | |||||
Forward Dividend Yield % | 1.32 | |||||
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % | 1.38 | |||||
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio | -0.2 | |||||
Shareholder Yield % | 7.59 |
Profitability Rank
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Margin % | 23.81 | |||||
Operating Margin % | 13.73 | |||||
Net Margin % | 3.8 | |||||
EBITDA Margin % | 14.06 | |||||
FCF Margin % | 22.72 | |||||
OCF Margin % | 30.47 | |||||
ROE % | 2.25 | |||||
ROA % | 1.37 | |||||
3-Year ROIIC % | -96.2 | |||||
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % | 3.62 | |||||
ROCE % | 2.37 | |||||
Years of Profitability over Past 10-Year | 8 | |||||
Moat Score | 7 | |||||
Tariff Resilience Score | 5 |
GF Value Rank
| Name | Current | Vs Industry | Vs History | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PE Ratio | 456.78 | |||||
Forward PE Ratio | 11.06 | |||||
PE Ratio without NRI | 20.11 | |||||
Shiller PE Ratio | 20.39 | |||||
Price-to-Owner-Earnings | 71.76 | |||||
PS Ratio | 2.57 | |||||
PB Ratio | 1.81 | |||||
Price-to-Tangible-Book | 2.29 | |||||
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow | 11.6 | |||||
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow | 8.56 | |||||
EV-to-EBIT | 50.2 | |||||
EV-to-Forward-EBIT | 8.55 | |||||
EV-to-EBITDA | 20.82 | |||||
EV-to-Forward-EBITDA | 6.86 | |||||
EV-to-Revenue | 2.93 | |||||
EV-to-Forward-Revenue | 2.66 | |||||
EV-to-FCF | 12.88 | |||||
Price-to-GF-Value | 1.53 | |||||
Price-to-Projected-FCF | 2.13 | |||||
Price-to-Median-PS-Value | 0.78 | |||||
Price-to-Graham-Number | 1.43 | |||||
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % | 1.99 | |||||
FCF Yield % | 9.22 | |||||
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % | 15.67 |
Operating Revenue by Business Segment
Operating Revenue by Geographic Region
Historical Operating Revenue by Business Segment
Historical Operating Revenue by Geographic Region
Guru Trades
See DetailsInsider Trades
See DetailsGurus Latest Trades with NYSE:ALB
Peter Lynch Chart
Performance
Annualized Return % Â
Total Annual Return % Â
Albemarle Corp Executives
DetailsAnalyst Estimate
Key Statistics
| Name | Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (TTM) (Mil $) | 5,907.904 | ||
| EPS (TTM) ($) | 0.27 | ||
| Beta | 1.3791 | ||
| 3-Year Sharpe Ratio | -0.08 | ||
| 3-Year Sortino Ratio | -0.12 | ||
| Volatility % | 55.62 | ||
| 14-Day RSI | 42.61 | ||
| 14-Day ATR ($) | 5.976932 | ||
| 20-Day SMA ($) | 133.895 | ||
| 12-1 Month Momentum % | 80.64 | ||
| 52-Week Range ($) | 71.25 - 221 | ||
| Shares Outstanding (Mil) | 118.01 |
Piotroski F-Score Details
| Component | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Piotroski F-Score | 7 | ||
| Positive ROA | |||
| Positive CFROA | |||
| Higher ROA yoy | |||
| CFROA > ROA | |||
| Lower Leverage yoy | |||
| Higher Current Ratio yoy | |||
| Less Shares Outstanding yoy | |||
| Higher Gross Margin yoy | |||
| Higher Asset Turnover yoy |
Albemarle Corp Filings
| Filing Date | Document Date | Form | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Filing Data | ||||
Albemarle Corp Stock Events
| Event | Date | Price ($) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fourth quarter earnings conference call for 2026 | 2027-02-12 08:00 | In 156 days | ||
| Annual report for 2026 | 2027-02-11 | In 154 days | ||
| Fourth quarter earnings results for 2026 | 2027-02-11 | In 154 days | ||
| Third quarter earnings conference call for 2026 | 2026-11-06 08:00 | In 58 days | ||
| Third quarter earnings results for 2026 | 2026-11-05 | In 56 days | ||
| USD 0.410000 Cash Dividend | 2026-09-11 | In 1 day | ||
| Second quarter earnings conference call for 2026 | 2026-08-06 08:00 | 118.84 (-2.63%) | ||
| Second quarter earnings results for 2026 | 2026-08-05 | 120.82 (+0.32%) | ||
| USD 0.405000 Cash Dividend | 2026-06-12 | 159.06 (+5.11%) | ||
| First quarter earnings conference call for 2026 | 2026-05-07 08:00 | 192.61 (-4.20%) |
Albemarle Corp Frequently Asked Questions
Guru Commentaries on NYSE:ALB
Albemarle Corp. has faced a pullback recently as prices for battery grade lithium have retreated due to a short-term boost to supply. Despite a good run-up earlier in the year, the company is now seen as a detractor in the portfolio. The manager notes, 'While Albemarle had a good run-up earlier in the year, it has pulled back recently as prices for battery grade lithium have retreated in the face of a short-term boost to supply.' However, they continue to expect shortages in these materials in the long term.
While Albemarle had a good run-up earlier in the year it has pulled back recently as prices for battery grade lithium have retreated in the face of a short-term boost to supply. Longer term we continue to expect shortages in these materials.
We established a new position in ALB, a global leader in lithium with Tier 1, low-cost assets, in particular in the Chilean salar and Western Australia. We continue to believe that lithium remains one of the most structurally attractive commodities, given secular demand for battery technology. The Iran conflict will continue the secular theme of electrification and the diversification of energy sources away from Middle East oil. The beneficiaries include battery technology, both for EVs and utility-scale energy storage systems (ESS). Historically, supply has been slow to respond, and ongoing mining issues in China only add to supply constraints, reinforcing our expectation of a tighter market as demand increases.
Press Release
Headlines
See More- 1
- 1
We'd love to learn more about your experiences on GuruFocus.com and how we can improve!
Take Survey
